In the early days of e-commerce, brands could get by with simple logistics setups, often a single warehouse and a basic shipping contract with one of the major last-mile carriers. Delivery was slower and more expensive, but consumer demands were lower and operations were less complex.
That world no longer exists.
Over the last decade, consumer expectations have been permanently reshaped by Amazon Prime and the rise of next-day everything. Today, brands are under pressure to provide fast, free, and seamless delivery and returns. More than 80% of shoppers expect same-day delivery and nearly a third want it at no additional cost.1 Even B2B buyers, once tolerant of longer lead times, are demanding one- or two-day fulfillment. Delivery speed and cost are now defining elements of the consumer experience, the same way a retail storefront once was.
At the same time, operational complexity is mounting. Logistics teams are in a constant state of adaptation due to volatile shipping costs, shifting tariffs, geopolitical uncertainty, and macro headwinds. Sales channels have also multiplied, so brands now must coordinate fulfillment across DTC storefronts, online marketplaces, wholesale retailers, subscription programs, and brick-and-mortar locations—each with its own requirements, timelines, demand patterns, and standards for a best-in-class delivery experience.
We believe that this combination of rising expectations and operational sprawl has made fulfillment one of the most difficult and highest stakes functions for modern brands. It is no longer just about moving product from point A to point B. A single stockout, delay, or poor delivery experience can send a customer to a competitor with one click. One survey found that nearly 80% of shoppers will not return after a negative delivery experience.2 As loyalty is increasingly earned after the point of purchase, these moments now directly impact a brand’s revenue and retention.
Our research shows that many brands lack the scale, complex infrastructure, time, and internal expertise to meet these expectations on their own. Outside of Amazon, we have not observed any dominant fulfillment solutions built for the broader internet. For the vast majority of brands, replicating that level of customer experience in house may not be feasible. In our conversations with e-commerce operators at companies doing hundreds of millions in revenue, most shared the same view: building fulfillment in house is simply not worth it. It is expensive, operationally complex, and far removed from their core focus. Historically, only the largest enterprises could justify the investment needed to build and manage a national logistics operation. For everyone else, fulfillment has meant stitching together a patchwork of third parties, tools, and manual processes. But that model is starting to break down.
Years ago, fulfillment could be an afterthought. Today, we believe it is a major competitive risk and, increasingly, where a brand’s reputation is won or lost.
Commerce has changed. Fulfillment hasn’t.
While there are existing third-party logistics (3PL) providers and off-the-shelf software options, many legacy fulfillment setups are struggling to keep pace with today’s demands. Many brands still rely on cobbled together operations of regional 3PL warehouses, ad-hoc software tools, spreadsheets, and manual processes. This fragmented approach can lead to gaps between systems, poor visibility, and, ultimately, a disjointed customer experience.
A typical mid-sized or early enterprise brand might use one vendor for warehousing, another for transportation, a separate order management system, plus a handful of point solutions for returns, tracking, and inventory. These systems rarely integrate well out of the box, and often do not provide what consumers want—a clear delivery promise, great tracking, and simple returns. In many cases, brands need to pay a separate provider to build custom integrations between tools. Inventory lives in silos by region or channel, and order data often gets lost in translation. Operations teams are left to stitch it all together manually, spending valuable time reconciling data, chasing errors, and managing vendors. Even something as basic as launching a new sales channel or entering a new region can require integration of multiple new partners, each with their own systems and SLAs. This can result in complexity, delays, and constant firefighting in a time when brands need speed and agility.
Some incumbents have proven they can scale with brands and maintain operational rigor. But, even among the best traditional 3PLs, the customer experience can often fall short. Many still run on outdated or off-the-shelf software, which limits visibility, slows down execution, and makes it difficult to tailor workflows to the unique needs of modern brands. While they may excel at moving products, traditional 3PLs were not designed with digital native or omnichannel operators in mind.
At the other end of the spectrum are newer, tech-forward startups that emphasize software but lack operational depth. These platforms can work well for early-stage DTC brands with low SKU counts, but tend to break down with higher order volumes, more complex inventory structures, or B2B requirements. Most avoid supporting both DTC and wholesale altogether, leaving growing brands to choose between flexibility and functional reach. There is a clear gap in the market, particularly for mid-sized brands seeking a best-in-class experience.
We believe that incremental improvements to the old models are no longer enough. What the market needs is a fundamentally different approach: One that combines executional scale with software depth in a single, unified platform. Just as AWS reshaped the way companies scale infrastructure by removing the need to build and manage their own servers, we believe the same transformation is underway in commerce. Brands no longer want to build the stack themselves. They want to plug into one that just works. And they need a partner that can deliver speed, visibility, and reliability from day one.
That is the future we see, and it is what drew us to Stord.